pdb1: Really ? Would it ? Lol . Not any room or need for discretion . We are all adults . There needs to be more transparency . More options . More info .
Really, yes it would, lol.
The contradictions seem to be mounting up.
No need for discretion ...unless you're the member of an existing club, in which case censorship is absolutely fine.
You say you want more options ...but not for everybody; only for people you deem should have them (or is it for those that fit your argument?). And in this case you don't want to give that option to people who are already members of a country club.
Why? It sounds to me like you want to give them less information, less options; treat them like mushrooms. You know, keep them in the dark and feed them bull...
As you so rightly say, we are all adults here; seems like you see some adults as being more equal than others. And the others, the ones who have actually demonstrated a desire to join a club by doing so, aren't allowed to be made aware of the better options available to them. Do you believe something happens to them once they become members of a club; that they have chosen their place in WGT life and opted for a sedentary lifestyle?
I'm struggling to believe that I'm not having a conversation with two people here; the one at the beginning of this thread that appeared to believe in a free market economy; the one who was happy in the knowledge that his members were happy and free to do as they wish.
And now this other, who prefers the big brother approach; and "protects" his members from the "evils" of those nasty other clubs by denying them access to tools that everyone else has. Sounds a little like North Korea to me ...what say you?
Roddy
P.S. You really must be more careful about taking sections of quotes, and getting muddled up; people might not realise you are taking things out of context