GoldCard:Thank you
But it took me almost a year whereas your average was 59 as old master in only 5 weeks?
Perhaps I need a plastic ruler lol lol
Not everyone is gullible :(
It took me 21 days just to make master, and I did it by playing KIA B9 over and over again, which was tied with STA F9 as the easiest nine holes that there were. I've seen other players make master in 2-10 days, so compared to them, my progress was very slow. If I were restarted today as a hack, I could make master in a matter of hours. Obviously, then, my play was not exceptional straight out of the gate.
I don't know when it was that I first hit 59, but I didn't stay 59, probably even at the end of August. Of course, if I were on the master tees still, a 59 average would probably be cake for me now, but I've gotten better with time. I don't know that I'll be able to improve upon my play on STA F9, KIA B9, BPB F9, or BPB B9, but my improvement so far has been gradual, and I am, without a doubt, a better player now than I was in September, and I was, without a doubt, a better player in September than I was in August.
I've also played a lot more than you have in terms of rounds per day. In just over 3 months, I have 537 ranked rounds played, whereas you have 1,055 ranked rounds in 10 months. It might've only taken me 21 days to make master, but in that 21 days, I probably played as many rounds as you play in 35-36 days. I'd guess that someone who plays 1 round a week for 50 weeks is not as good as someone that plays 1 round a day for 50 days, since so much goes on in between those weekly rounds that a casual player will never be able to remember anything they might've been able to learn the previous round unless they are exceptional note-takers. On top of that, I made master by playing KIA B9 over and over, which no doubt made it my strongest 9-hole round, so you say that while I made master in 21 days, I really had about the same amount of experience as the average person who'd played 60-90 days.
Fact is, GoldCard, according to the stats, there is only one active player out there that has better approach shots than you. You're just clearly bad at putting, so you get angry when someone who's played half as much as you is already a superior putter. Your approach shots stat shows that you can aim click as well as anyone, but your putting stats show that you can't putt to save your life. I'm not better than you because I'm a better aim clicker; I'm better than you because I, like apparently many dozens of others, know how to putt with the correct amount of power and can read break better than you, which no third-party software can do, as far as we know.