Dear Mr. 79,
I am checking my rulebook in re "good play and intimidation" to see how many infractions this entails. It's not looking good.
First of all, I noticed that the primary offender, who you wisely did not name, ("Mac"), cleverly changed her picture to "hide the evidence." Fortuneately I have some memory left and can recall the picture to be ridiculously "cute." How deceptive! But not against the rules.
And this derisive use of the term "Scoreboy," while initially quite humorous (I am almost through laughing now)- is most certainly an infraction in all cases but one. Unfortuneately this appears to be that very one as the evidence seems to indicate that it was a statement of fact. Sorry, Scoreboy.
The final and possibly most devastating point of protest is the one concerning the "good play," "solid play," and "clutch putting" of both opponents, especially the one known as "cate55". This I find truly objectionable and am prepared to deal with. Cut it out.
The Commish