skip nav


Re: Tiger

rated by 0 users
Tue, Jun 16 2009 12:02 PM by Futures. 22 replies.
  • nivlac United States
    2,188 Posts
    Fri, Jun 12 2009 10:45 AM

    My only point was that Sergio has little composure compared to Tiger.

    I don't know where the implication that I said Sergio was better or even in Tiger's league came from...

    I dunno how else to explain it... so I give up on this thread. :)



  • Griz0613 United States
    80 Posts
    Fri, Jun 12 2009 4:07 PM

    It's like this in every sport... Who is the greatest of all time. You can really only seperate them by generations. We will never know. As far as the top 10 finishes... the players back then played every tournament, and Tiger plays maybe 1 out of 4? They were all great, the end

  • Futures United States
    79 Posts
    Tue, Jun 16 2009 12:02 PM

    Nothing against your post, but Tiger cannot be considered the best until he breaks the records (most majors and most wins).  It's debatable, but until those records are actually broken, he is not the best player of all time. 

    Another debate is that Jack's competition was far greater than what Tiger plays week to week.  Jack's era had better golfers.

     Ben Hogan was the best ball striker of all time (and always will be). Tee to green, Hogan was an accuracy machine (better than Tiger).    Tiger has the best all around game compared to anyone.