Do you actually mean you reported him?
I did, too.
Might not have done it to a new second account - maybe an error. Alas, that low account (re-)activated after six years was suspicious enough without knowing the other one in detail.
You are correct, both accounts look harmless enough, but who knows what hides behind a "harmless" transgression(?)
It may also be a signal to more serious multis.
And who knows maybe the other 3 Pittdoc accounts are him too, Just look. One of them is Pittdoc2828 when one of the 2 that posted here is Pittdoc28. Suspicious to say the least,
No alosso, it will not be a signal to more serious multis. Serious multis win credits and do it by knowing and manipulating the game, here we have someone who wins nothing, didn't even know how tier progression works and posted under two accounts. I don't see serious multis learning anything.
What hides behind this harmless transgression is nothing of consequence. As I said he came to the forum complaining as his tier hadn't gone up, that's stupid for a multi.
It's said above (by one of the almost 30 Borntobe's) "And who knows maybe the other 3 Pittdoc accounts are him too, Just look. One of them is Pittdoc2828 when one of the 2 that posted here is Pittdoc28. Suspicious to say the least," ironic if he was reported by one of the over 300, Topshelf's and Borntobe please note one of them is Topshelf20 ;-).
All of the Pittdoc accounts mentioned are barely played on and are harmless.
I'm not actually arguing that he's not a multi, he is and personally I'd reckon the primary account isn't a Pittdoc one.
There are many on here that play the game and with the system there is eventually get promoted to tees they just don't enjoy playing off (maybe they don't want to join a cc and play red tee or even know they can), so they start again. These are the people you report and wgt ban mainly because they fall into your lap. The ones stealing credits from other players are often fairly obvious too but much harder to catch so I suspect neither wgt nor people that report the harmless ones try.
Wgt have a rule that now this breech has been reported they will no doubt follow, all I'm saying is we don't have to push this process when it's clearly unjust.
alosso I address this last bit to you and reopen old wounds as, even if this seems otherwise, I do respect your opinions and honestly this not out of malice. How does "You are correct, both accounts look harmless enough, but who knows what hides behind a "harmless" transgression(?) stand with the whole "proof or lies" debate?
The idea of some account belonging to this person doing anything harmful to anyone seems extremely unlikely to to me.