Agree Doc. It is silly. I too have fallen into the same type of results as to what you stated. Having a determination where the latter holes have greater statistical value otherwise lessens the significance of earlier holes (i.e., 1 thru 12...or whatever equation is being applied). And, in real golf, we all know that has no weight whatsoever. For those of us who do play real golf for cheddar, logic dictates that lower handicap golfers (amateurs, of course) otherwise do what in money games? That's right...they are made to give strokes. So, for example, if a level 95 Legend (w/ a 62 avg) ties a level 107 TL (w/ a 55 avg) in any format without a playoff (other than skins), this would suggest (most of the time) that he or she played better than the higher leveled player did. I think that's hard to argue (notwithstanding, of course, a level 99 Tour Master who is still playing from the ladies tees with the games best equipment). How the heck do you address that? I'm not suggesting that wgt starts assigning strokes. But if someone has played 1,500 rds more than their competitor, and they tie, who should get the win (again, absent a playoff)? Higher leveled players don't have to like this logic. But it does make this entire scoring debacle a simple and fairer way. If you are statistically better (scoring avg and level), then prove it. If you tie, than you lose. For wgt...in terms of competition, this will keep your lower leveled players more interested (and willing to spend) and your higher levels more focused. All food for thought....