Geeze, I see Bollox was right on it before everyone else AGAINS! This demands another conspiracy theorist to expostulate vacuously upon just so how come people who can access important paperwork can do it before anyone else- This smacks of underhand methodology so therefore I quit. Tommorow. First thing.
So anyway I was just asking the other day if the new Enquirer was out and Andyson said and I quote, "No". (He didn't say "and I quote", he just said "No", I felt I should make that clear. Don't suppose there would have been much point in saying "and I quote No " now would there. So really what I am saying is I only included this helpful parenthesis for those amongst us who might have been confused. Actually,when I say "us", clearly I cannot include me in that statement because obviously I understood what I meant or I wouldn't have been able to provide the helpful parenthesis, so in fact, it is not "us", but "you". Hope this clears up the confusion to which you have now become unwittingly a part of.)
Beware people who say "Quote" because it sounds like "Quit" and there will be some amongst us ( I am not including myself here in the "us"- see above paragraph for explanation) who take quote to be quit, or quit to be quote, which necessarily would engender the most confusingest of scenarios if in fact there was no "quit" or "quote" following the statement. This is why I say beware.
Now to get back on topic-I have to wonder who is to blame here for straying, or at least, is the reader complicit in the stray, simply for reading this? Hansard will most probabaly have precedent galore but I digress m'Lud.
Another epic Andy, but yet again that ruffian who delivers it has torn all of the pages out, leaving me on the very verge of tantal, it's a scandal to be sure.
Lizzie xx