Forums

X

• mantis0014 8,946 Posts

  Sat, Aug 16 2014 7:01 AM

  .echo

• SweetiePie 4,925 Posts

  Sat, Aug 16 2014 8:12 AM

  YancyCan:

  X

   

  Ah yes, the great Miller Barber

• YancyCan 3,027 Posts

  Sat, Aug 16 2014 8:38 AM

  DaddysKat:

  

  Aha. These what be the numbers that solve for X. Was posting LATE last night and while I had my null hypothesis and such, I couldn't find this schematic. Please do me a favor and DO NOT show this to anyone else and whatnots. I am cereal.
  Sincerely, I am Yancy

• AeriesTakaaki 83 Posts

  Sat, Aug 16 2014 8:57 AM

  42.

• JFidanza 1,676 Posts

  Sat, Aug 16 2014 9:16 AM

  X   =   (∞+1) / (∞-1)

• YankeeJim 25,827 Posts

  Sat, Aug 16 2014 10:02 AM

  JFidanza:

  X   =   (∞+1) / (∞-1)

  Triple it and you get one of these......     :-)

  

• mantis0014 8,946 Posts

  Sat, Aug 16 2014 2:34 PM

  AeriesTakaaki:

  42.

  correct ....lol

• JFidanza 1,676 Posts

  Sat, Aug 16 2014 3:26 PM

  YankeeJim:

  JFidanza:

  X   =   (∞+1) / (∞-1)

  Triple it and you get one of these......     :-)

  yes yes yes..Molson, a fav since the early 80s. how are those xxx?

  X = the null set

  or 2 + 1 = xxx, but that's only in College.

  Yancy, your name is Yancy, I remember the unedited OP. Maybe just start w/ the Versa #7 (L86+) and the rest writes itself. I'd gift it to you, but that might take me 2 weeks of live gamer.

• CerinoDevoti 3,232 Posts

  Sat, Aug 16 2014 6:20 PM

  

• DarkenRahl 2,115 Posts

  Sat, Aug 16 2014 9:20 PM

  mantis0014:

  AeriesTakaaki:

  42.

  correct ....lol

  Which can be proved by the Gently Theory of Fundamental Interconnectedness of course.