World Golf Tour
Forums

Re: WGT and Tiger Woods Online

Wed, Nov 11 2009 12:57 PM by YankeeJim. 7 replies.
  • Greatwhiteshark1 United States
    Tue, Jul 28 2009 2:02 PM

    All I have to say is that WGT is way better than Tiger Woods. When I first heard about Tiger Woods I was happy about it and thought it would be a great game, but it is not. The only thing it has going for it is the fact that it is 3-D, but with its slow game play it is horrible. The only good thing about it is that it is competition for WGT and it will cause WGT to make more improvement here. WGTs game play is so much better and easier to get used to. I have played 50+ rounds at Tiger Woods and have yet to shoot better than 4 over which is ridiculous. I have played about the same here and already shot 6 under. As a matter of fact I was able to get used to WGT so fast that I was asked if I had two accounts here. Thanks for the great game and keep up the good work. I look forward to seeing what the future brings for WGT. Thanks.

  • DeerRun United States
    Tue, Jul 28 2009 3:31 PM

    My thoughts exactly.  I play on Tiger Woods Online now and then and WGT has them beat in a number of ways.  The graphics on TWO is poor, it takes forever for a game to load.  Keep up the good work WGT.

  • Faterson Slovakia
    Tue, Nov 10 2009 7:48 PM

    Was searching for a thread comparing WGT and TWO until I found this one. All the other threads have been locked because of undue controversies.    Hope we can keep this thread nice & civil. (It needs to be said the previous 2 posts are months old, and especially TWO has greatly evolved since then.)

    Earlier tonight I managed to complete my very first TWO round, a 93 at Pebble Beach.    I'm blown away: the game ran very smoothly from start to finish (in full-screen mode, too), and the graphics seemed much improved compared to the previous Beta cycle. I could never see ball flight previously, and Wolf Creek looked pretty shabby. Now, the same courses look glorious, despite my notebook being 3 years old and not capable of running the game using the best graphics settings. TWO's images are, of course, computer-generated, and can't compete with the clarity of WGT's HD photographs, but they are of astounding quality anyway.

    What an experience it is, to see incoming ocean waves at the famous Pebble Beach, hole 7! What a thrill it is to see a flock of birds fly over your head as you tee off on hole 18! Those kinds of experiences will never be offered here on WGT.com, due to the static nature of photographs. It was such a thrill to play there I (inadvertently) sent at least half a dozen balls into the ocean to celebrate the occasion; it's a good thing I didn't have to buy them.  

    The range of camera views is much wider on TWO. You can choose any set of pin positions, green speeds, fairway speeds, tees, winds. There's a wide array of keyboard shortcuts: you can move your aim around just by pressing the arrow keys on your keyboard! That's definitely the better way to do it for me, instead of messing around with the mouse all the time. You can activate the shot meter with the spacebar, too. And the shot meter is smooth as silk, no hiccups whatsoever. Multiplayer is now possible in TWO, too, although I haven't tried it in practice yet.

    None of this worked for me in TWO's previous Beta cycle. I couldn't complete a single round back then. It looks like they improved the game tremendously over the last few weeks. I have likewise improved my 3-year-old notebook: I bought a new hard-drive for it, a Seagate with 7200rpm. It makes the notebook run faster and nearly noiselessly; could the new hard-drive, at my end, have contributed to the game becoming playable for me? I wouldn't know the answer to this.

    The game did not seem excessively easy to play for me; witness my premier round of 93 (using the easiest settings), although I was more or less shooting haphazardly just to check if I could complete all 18 holes.

    All in all, WGT now has some stiff competition in TWO. The other game already offers 5 full stroke-play courses, with the sixth course to be released in days' time.

    True, the two games follow completely different business models. WGT will always be free to play with basic equipment, whereas TWO will be subscription-based. Judging by today's experience with TWO, however, I'd be willing to pay up to $10 per month for playing TWO.

  • tibbets United States
    Tue, Nov 10 2009 8:14 PM

    Glad to hear you finally got the darned thing to run.  Sounds like it was worth the wait!

    As a few have said before, both games are worthwhile to play in their own right.  There's no need for any of us to choose one or the other.  Variety is, after all, the spice of life!

  • Faterson Slovakia
    Tue, Nov 10 2009 8:20 PM

    tibbets:
    both games are worthwhile to play in their own right.  There's no need for any of us to choose one or the other.

    Yup! I've just sent a post to the Ladders forum, suggesting to Mark that TWO might now be incorporated on that site as well. A Ladder match is a Ladder match, and it doesn't really matter on which of the 7 courses (2 at WGT / 5 at TWO) it would be played; the main thing is, it would be the same course for both/all players involved in that particular match.

  • EllisSpice United Kingdom
    Wed, Nov 11 2009 5:37 AM

    I'm going to retry TWO again myself sometime today to see if I get it to work. If I can't, then I guess I'll never know what it's like...

  • thunderbird United States
    Wed, Nov 11 2009 12:45 PM

    I have yet to comment on TWO.  I have been playing since the second beta and find the two to be on completely different levels.  WGT creates the feeling of being at the course with the real life pictures which I enjoy being a former professional golfer.  Lets me feel as though I am back playing the game at the level that I enjoy.  

    TWO on the other hand provides a gaming experience that I am use to with EA Sports.  Its a golf game with a high level of quality.  Building your character which could take quite a bit of time and playing.  As I get older and have less time to build my character from start to finish it becomes less appealing to me knowing that I will be competing with the young bucks you have dedicated their young life's to gaming.  They will be playing with a character has full attributes as I continue to work to build my character.  Now I know that is a ridiculous thought but I would rather pay to get there.  That's my opinion.  

    Now I truly enjoy both games and I agree with Tibbets they provide a little variety to my life.  It may be a different story when I can play on EA Sports for more than character cash and they offer some real prizes.  

    I personally can't wait for this game to really take form and I encourage the WGT staff to seriously push forward to completing the beta.  Find the funds, investors, staff, and whatever you need to get a complete project because this game really has the ability to compete with the EA Sports.   

  • YankeeJim United States
    Wed, Nov 11 2009 12:57 PM

    I second that.

     

    YJ

     

RSS