My goodness this is extraordinary!!
I am always late to the party aren't I - lols, I got to here by way of JC Snead and it's just mind boggling stuff and will take a long long while to 'see' exactly what is going on, but have a 'grasp' of it already - he's looking for geometric relationships that exist to define the exact putting offset.
With that in mind deena does what deena does - deenas way!!
deena would probably cross-reference the formula with a geometric relationship that falls within the several categories mentioned - this would enable me to learn and 'see' what is precisely going on, i.e. you determine the offset using the formula then seek the corresponding vertex, seek the half putter, seek the dot alignment...
If JC Snead had of seen this way of cross-checking instead of attacking it outright as witchcraft lols, if JC Snead had done that instead........well he would be deena wouldn't he!!
It's one of my greatest strengths that you know - if I see something that's better or can make something EVEN better than it already is, even if it's my own thing that it does better - I will work with it until I have something quite deadly!!!!
G0LD's/ Sneads is deadly but suffers from measurement error, e.g. the exact dot time, the exact offset, unseen wobbles and bobbles (nuances if it tickles 'ones' fancy - I don't need to try to be intelligent because I wrote La-ferrari 19 lolololos), Tekoma seems deadly but suffers from 'estimating' the initial offset which could lead to the wrong vertex being chosen and whatnot, but together they could represent the absolute and ultimate putting predictor.....
I intend to cross-reference these 2 very potent methods - which have their own flaws individually - to come up with something with no flaws and is quite invincible!!!
I am going to call it 'deenas Ruby-Murray' - Curry see, fusion cooking GET IT?? lololos
When I can be bothered playing again, lolololos!!!
(my weakness is boredom of course - all great minds become bored quite quickly and mine is surely the greatest mind, nobody saw it did they? JC Snead obviously didn't see it in his rejection of Tekomas methods, Tekoma made no mention of it either and neither did any of you lot - duhhh you have only had since 2014 to realise what I have realised the very same day I watched this set of methods!!
Correction: Fat Dan got it on the pinned Tekoma thread above...
"If you use g0lds formula for reading the dots for a week when you practice, you will find it makes Tek's system a whole lot easier as you will already have a good visual idea where the general area to aim is..."
But there was very little else if nothing at all proposing that both methods could be cross-referenced to give a putting system that was flawless.
It's all about INSIGHT.
I told you I have this tremendous insight (only a few like Theoretical Physicists have it), nobody thought of using the 2 methods together to compliment each other - I am a big head but as you can see it's based on merit!!!).
I now understand all of the techniques presented and look forward to playing them in conjunction with the formula soon.
I consider this to be in the category of 'seminal work' and it is posted up with the other 2 seminal works on my profile for your convenience.
PAUL (pdb1) - LIFETIME FORUM BLOCK!!!
POINTLESS, INDIRECT ANTAGONISM.
THE SYSTEM IS FLAWLESS, THE GAME IS NOT - BY DESIGN, YET THE 'ALGORITHM IS CORRECT', AS IT IS WITH G0LDs FORMULA - WHICH IS BY FAR THE MORE ACCURATE PUTTING PREDICTION METHOD.
PLEASE DO NOT RATTLE MY BEES PRESENTING NOTHING AT ALL - IF I WILL DO IT TO PAUL I WILL DO IT TO ANYBODY, WHEN U ANSWERT ME PLEASE DO DOUBLE CHECK YOU HAVEN'T SAID SOMETHING THAT MIGHT UPSET ME - BECAUSE YOU WILL NEVER UPSET ME AGAIN IN THIS PARTICULAR UNIVERSE CYCLE.
BLOCKED, BANNED, KICKED.
Note (alanti - latest WGT member to face the lifetime block, this time for 'bigotry stirring' as I see it.
Christian world has enough of them already, compound on top the most bigoted sport in the world and bigot stirring is akin to lighting the powder keg here).
Keep going - I don't think the list has a limit on how many pieces of trash it can hold.